17 things we'd change about names in Linux

09. Recursive acronyms

Gnu's Not Unix probably started it all and PHP Hypertext Processor was a reasonable implementation, but recursive acronyms have become a plague.

Are we the only ones to cringe when people use corruptions such as M$, or much worse, to describe Windows and Microsoft? Are we really so insecure in the superiorities of our beloved operating system that we have to resort to name‑calling? Doing this in a Linux forum is pointless; doing it in a Windows or mixed forum is no more than antagonistic.

GIMP

Here's a classic example of a key open source program having an unsuitable name, but it's too late to change it. A name as geeky as Gimp may have been fine when it was starting out, but you can't expect people to refer to images as having been 'Gimped', so even Gimp users turn to the term 'Photoshopped' to avoid sounding odd in normal company.

16. Windows is no better

Windows users often cite meaningless names as a weakness of Linux, falling back on their shining examples of Internet Explorer and Word, and completely ignoring Excel, Outlook and many others. They mutter when these are mentioned, but leap upon you when you bring up the equally obscure Acrobat. "That's a third‑party program, it doesn't count," they exclaim, whereupon you can point out that all Linux programs are third party and rest your case.

17. Choqok

In case you were wondering, the name of this excellent micro‑blogging client comes from the ancient Persian word for sparrow. If ancient Persian isn't arcane enough for you, we'll leave it to you to work out the relationship between a sparrow and micro‑blogging. It's got to be more than the fact that sparrows, like many other birds, tweet.

TOPICS