Samsung SyncMaster 243T review

It's got the looks, but where are the sockets?

TechRadar Verdict

A very nice monitor, that is only really suited for computer use. Expensive to boot

Pros

  • +

    Ultra high resolution

    Great for PC use

    Well designed

Cons

  • -

    It's a monitor

    Pricey

    Slow response time

Why you can trust TechRadar We spend hours testing every product or service we review, so you can be sure you're buying the best. Find out more about how we test.

It may be widescreen in shape and generous in size, but the SyncMaster 243T isn't strictly designed for home entertainment use. While at a cursory glance you may take this slick silver customer for a television, a second look will probably pick up the odd array of front controls that confirm that, yes, it's actually just a PC monitor.

But what a monitor! At 24in in width and with a sky-high resolution of 1,920 x 1,200 pixels (that's over 2.3 million of the little squares in all, stat fans), it's the kind of display that most PC owners can only dream about.

Performance

As far as being a standard PC monitor is concerned, there is one area where the SyncMaster is something of a letdown: its response time of 30ms. Now, this won't prove a significant problem for those using the screen for working, web browsing, DVD and TV watching and the like, but it makes gaming a little frustrating.

Rapid movements cause a noticeable blurring, 'ghosting' effect where the monitor's pixels can't change colour quite quickly enough; this becomes irritating at times, especially with fast paced fare like Far Cry or Doom 3; games designed to be played at a more sedate speed don't cause too many problems, however.

With many LCD monitors - including other Samsung models - having much better response times of 16ms and less, we wouldn't recommend it to serious gamers. That said, in terms of actual image quality, the 243T is pretty impressive.

The 1,920 x 1,200 resolution means that displaying vast amounts of detail comes to it extremely naturally, which means it works well when watching DVDs and recordings played back from a Media Center PC - something that more and more people will be doing if Microsoft has its way.

There are some downsides though, and the screen lacks a strong enough contrast range to impress, and consequently images seem to lack the all-important definition in darker areas.

All in all, we would recommend this Samsung monitor to those PC owners that need to be able to view lots of detail - such as graphic designers or programmers - or who watch plenty of DVD and DiVX movies.

It's a shame that it isn't really up to being a top-notch gaming monitor, but it will make a very good, if decidedly pricey, display for any of the recent crop of Media Center PCs; the fact that it's a widescreen model earns it some plus points in this respect as well.

If you're looking for a pure home cinema display, however, this isn't it; your £2,000 would be far better spent on a high quality 32in plasma panel.

TOPICS

Tech.co.uk was the former name of TechRadar.com. Its staff were at the forefront of the digital publishing revolution, and spearheaded the move to bring consumer technology journalism to its natural home – online. Many of the current TechRadar staff started life a Tech.co.uk staff writer, covering everything from the emerging smartphone market to the evolving market of personal computers. Think of it as the building blocks of the TechRadar you love today.Â